Denied Report Rule-breakers In game

[Thekillerwolf55]

Minecraft Username:

Thekillerwolf55​

What is your suggestion's title?

Report Rule-breakers By using Replay system​

Suggestion Details:

I understand that many of us suggested the /report command, but developers should add the replay mod instead. The Replay mod or Downloading the game recording, for instance, may be quite useful for reporting hackers. If a hacker kills someone and they don't have any recording software or time, they won't have any proof. In simple words, I'm proposing that Jartex should have a section for game replay downloads where you can click "match recap" to see all the game's details, including who won, and that way everyone can easily report hackers rather than experience latency spikes and dying without any evidence.​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?

This can be incredibly useful because not everyone has a high-end computer or software that doesn't cause their frame rates to dip and lag. This will allow a larger number of users to report hackers using the game recorder or replay mod, which will reduce the number of obvious hackers playing every day. Just think about it, we don't have to call staff members to spectate us and ban them. it will be convenient for us as well as staff members. But you have to report all the rule-breakers on the forum which can help you in getting the active reporter to a Great reporter​

 

[LOUAI_]

+1
really useful for catching hackers

 

[FuzniX]

It would be very useful indeed, but I think it's a lot of work to get that for not that much help. I will stay Neutral.

 

[ned_]

Minecraft Username:

Thekillerwolf55​

What is your suggestion's title?

Report Rule-breakers In game​

Suggestion Details:

I understand that many of us suggested the /report command, but developers should add the replay mod instead. The Replay mod or Downloading the game recording, for instance, may be quite useful for reporting hackers. If a hacker kills someone and they don't have any recording software or time, they won't have any proof. In simple words, I'm proposing that Jartex should have a section for game replay downloads where you can click "match recap" to see all the game's details, including who won, and that way everyone can easily report hackers rather than experience latency spikes and dying without any evidence.​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?

This can be incredibly useful because not everyone has a high-end computer or software that doesn't cause their frame rates to dip and lag. This will allow a larger number of users to report hackers using the game recorder or replay mod, which will reduce the number of obvious hackers playing every day. Just think about it, we don't have to call staff members to spectate us and ban them. it will be convenient for us as well as staff members. But you have to report all the rule-breakers on the forum which can help you in getting the active reporter to a Great reporter​

After reviewing your suggestion im giving a +1

 

[Empity0]

Minecraft Username:

Thekillerwolf55​

What is your suggestion's title?

Report Rule-breakers In game​

Suggestion Details:

I understand that many of us suggested the /report command, but developers should add the replay mod instead. The Replay mod or Downloading the game recording, for instance, may be quite useful for reporting hackers. If a hacker kills someone and they don't have any recording software or time, they won't have any proof. In simple words, I'm proposing that Jartex should have a section for game replay downloads where you can click "match recap" to see all the game's details, including who won, and that way everyone can easily report hackers rather than experience latency spikes and dying without any evidence.​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?

This can be incredibly useful because not everyone has a high-end computer or software that doesn't cause their frame rates to dip and lag. This will allow a larger number of users to report hackers using the game recorder or replay mod, which will reduce the number of obvious hackers playing every day. Just think about it, we don't have to call staff members to spectate us and ban them. it will be convenient for us as well as staff members. But you have to report all the rule-breakers on the forum which can help you in getting the active reporter to a Great reporter​

oh ok i edited this its now +1

 

[Thekillerwolf55]

-1 because it will kill the purpos of reporting in forums

No, read the suggestion again. I said a section where you can download the game recording as a replay and report the portion on forums, and the only purpose of this suggestion is that you dont have a good high end PC that supports a good recording software. every software takes fps and may cause fps to go down

 

[MiltonNJ05]

As others have noted, I believe that this would be a great feature on the server. However, the sheer amount of development necessary to implement a mass replay system on Jartex, combined with the large amount of storage necessary to house hundreds, if not thousands, of replays, seems to outweigh the benefits of a replay system. I would doubt that Jartex is in a good enough place financially to afford that kind of development/hardware, but if it indeed is, I still believe this feature would cost the server management more than it would possibly make them, therefore, I will remain neutral on this suggestion.

 

[Brook]

Well, what I believe is this would be a rather convenient feature as stated by you. Reducing the number of hackers through this method can be quite efficient on the overall server. Would be appropriate for both players and staffs.
I'm giving this a +1 (Because why not!)

 

[Stxrs]

As others have noted, I believe that this would be a great feature on the server. However, the sheer amount of development necessary to implement a mass replay system on Jartex, combined with the large amount of storage necessary to house hundreds, if not thousands, of replays, seems to outweigh the benefits of a replay system. I would doubt that Jartex is in a good enough place financially to afford that kind of development/hardware, but if it indeed is, I still believe this feature would cost the server management more than it would possibly make them, therefore, I will remain neutral on this suggestion.

I agree with this statement. I will stay neutral as of now

 

[HeadsBreker]

I'm very sure That it have been suggested before, So I don't know If developers can do it.