Menu

Learn how to start playing on JartexNetwork in just 60 seconds!
Play Now
Learn how to join our server
and start playing in 60 seconds
Play Now
CLICK TO JOIN JOIN OUR DISCORD
0
0

Denied Immortal Factions Base Rule Change/Addition

iboo

Donator
Donator
Joined
August 24, 2019
Messages
252
Points
36
Minecraft Username:
Ibo.​

What is your suggestion's title?
Base Rule Change/Addition​

Suggestion Details:
So currently theres a rule that you're only allowed to have 2 (money making) spawner boxes within your base claims.​
However if you break this rule your faction will recieve only 2 strikes first offence.​
There currently is ALOT of people building uncountable amounts of 4x4blocks spawner boxes within their base so its impossible/really hard to raid them, these people do not care about the strikes as they're profiting from the spawners. if we add a 3-7 ban punishment to the box builder / spawner placer the amount of people who do this will decrease by alot. Theres also alot of people hiding their value (in their base claim) at illegal places such as Rev-Layers the 3-7d punishment should be counting for this aswell.​
''But you can report the rule breakers?!''​
- Yes we can, but what is it going to change? they'll keep continuing as they don't care about their strikes. the raiding faction will still have to waste alot of tnt raiding all the boxes/spawners.​
(Edit: Theres a difference between people who didn't know about the rule and made a 3rd or 4th box on mistake and people who make 200000 boxes on purpose)​

How could this idea help improve JartexNetwork?
Stop rule breakers in some way. Atleast the people that make 25 4x4 spawner boxes will stop doing it.​
 
Last edited:

BabbyXD

Addicted Member
Joined
August 27, 2017
Messages
661
Points
77
+1, it's quite strange that you can purposefully make your base almost impossible to raid (in terms of value), and the punishment for it is only 2 strikes, and a warning that they will get striked further if they don't correct their mistake within 1-2 days.

I think that depending on the severity of the infraction, more strikes should be given to them.
 

Emre_Asi

Member
Joined
September 23, 2020
Messages
19
Points
7
Age
16
+1, theres no way such low punishment will hold them up they get enough profit to ignore the strikes.
 

FieryAngel

Donator
Donator
Joined
June 10, 2018
Messages
203
Points
64
IGN
ThatDudeFiery
People only ignore strikes when it's below 4 strikes (Unless you're Invictus LOL), so I say to add 2 strikes for every additional box that exceed 2 or/and make the spawners that the said illegal box contain 1/3 Durability. Though I think the Striking System is way too forgiving, No one cares about Spawner Value reduction especially when It's early seasons and when the f top reaches to the Five Hundred Millions. the f shield punishment is fine aswell as the raid ban. Neutral.
 
AUTHOR
AUTHOR
iboo

iboo

Donator
Donator
Joined
August 24, 2019
Messages
252
Points
36
People only ignore strikes when it's below 4 strikes (Unless you're Invictus LOL), so I say to add 2 strikes for every additional box that exceed 2 or/and make the spawners that the said illegal box contain 1/3 Durability. Though I think the Striking System is way too forgiving, No one cares about Spawner Value reduction especially when It's early seasons and when the f top reaches to the Five Hundred Millions. the f shield punishment is fine aswell as the raid ban. Neutral.
The striking system is indeed way too forgiving for some specific rules. However if they dont care about the strikes they wouldn't care about the fshield punishment nor the raidban. If you set the spawners in the illegal box to 1/3 dura they'll still be the ones profiting as raiding them would not give the raiders any value but the defending faction will still profit from the 1/3 dura spawners.
 

FieryAngel

Donator
Donator
Joined
June 10, 2018
Messages
203
Points
64
IGN
ThatDudeFiery
The striking system is indeed way too forgiving for some specific rules. However if they dont care about the strikes they wouldn't care about the fshield punishment nor the raidban. If you set the spawners in the illegal box to 1/3 dura they'll still be the ones profiting as raiding them would not give the raiders any value but the defending faction will still profit from the 1/3 dura spawners.
No, they care about the f shield and the raid ban punishment. Unless they are a PvP Faction that literally just made the faction just so they wouldn't hurt each other in PvP they will care about those. without f shield PvP Fac's Traps would be left unguarded so if they by chance made someone really angry they can just easily cannon their trap off, and they will care about raid bans because unless they are a faction that literally doesn't raid. Though yes I haven't thought much about the Spawner Punishment so disregard that.
 

Top